A comparative study between covering ileal loop-without ostomy or delayed ostomy and diversion ileostomy for patients undergoing large bowel anastomosis

Background: In elective and emergency general surgery, bowel anastomoses are common procedures. Although several stoma-related issues may arise following stoma creation, establishing a is incredibly morbid. Aims Objectives: The study compares patients with diversion ileostomies (stomas) to those who had cover ileal loops without ostomies or delayed for large anastomosis compare the risks advantages of each procedure. Materials Methods: This prospective comparative was conducted on 50 undergoing anastomosis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A: Those covering loop ostomy, B: ileostomy. Results: Demographic data indicated that most participants in both groups male (72% 64% ostomy). groups, belonged >45 age group. We have seen significant difference setting Vitamin B 12 levels, early complications, late time takedown comparing ostomy Conclusion: showed reduced postoperative morbidity complications stomas compared Hence, technique should be considered.